Thursday, January 30, 2014

MD vs DO

MD vs DO (Allopathic vs Osteopathic medicine)

What's the difference between an MD and a DO?



So what’s the difference between allopathic and osteopathic (MD vs DO)? I’m going to make this as simple and short as possible:

DIfferences:

-MD is what we traditionally refer to as a doctor. They go to traditional medical schools (allopathic)
                                         -DO is a relatively new (over a 100 years) “type” of doctor.                                                   These doctors go to osteopathic school.

-MD physicians typically do not use as integrated an approach to their patients as DOs do
-DO physicians really stress the idea of mind, body, and soul. They also integrate
 manipulative techniques (as someone once explained it to me, an MD will look at your foot while a DO will roll a ball under it first)

-MD can practice virtually anywhere outside the US 
-DOs are fully licensed to work in the US and are gaining rights to practice outside the US. There are more limits on DOs practicing outside the US than MDs

-MD schools are harder to get into than DO schools
-DO schools are easier to get into than MD schools (it’s important to note, however, that osteopathic schools are really increasing their admissions screening. A few years ago, it was not uncommon for a student to get into a DO school with a 23 with the average MCAT score being around a 25. Now many DO schools have increased their average to 28)

-95% of MD students match for residency
-75% of DO students match for residency 

Similarities:

-They’re both real doctors
-They both go through the same medical education (if anything, DOs go through more in the sense that that also dedicate a small portion of their curriculum to manipulative techniques. 
-They both take the same national exams
-They can both go into the same medical specialities
-And lastly, they both suffer from the stresses of medical school along with its debt.

Hopefully that clears things up!

No comments:

Post a Comment